When
Stephen Hawking thinks he's right about a scientific theory, he doesn't back down, and he's not afraid to wager on himself.
Perhaps the most famous of Hawking's bets came in 1997, when he found himself in an argument with fellow theoretical physicists Kip Thorne and John Preskill. Hawking and Thorne contended that the information carried in Hawking radiation in black holes must be "new," a notion that would have required rewriting quantum physics. Preskill, on the other hand, felt that it was the view of black holes that needed rewriting. Since Hawking had likened the fate of information in a black hole to "burning an encyclopedia," the men wagered a set of encyclopedias on the outcome of their argument.
In 2004,
Stephen Hawking presented a paper that contradicted his previously held beliefs, so he conceded the bet and presented Preskill with a copy of
Total Baseball, The Ultimate Baseball Encyclopedia.
This bet wasn't
Stephen Hawking's first. In his bestseller
A Brief History of Time, he described a similar bet he made with Thorne in 1975. Hawking had long been a believer in the existence of black holes, but he wanted an "insurance policy" that would give him some consolation if his theories turned out to be bunk. The wager: if black holes didn't exist, Thorne had to cough up a four-year subscription to the British satirical magazine
Private Eye for Hawking as a consolation prize. If black holes existed, Hawking had to cover a one-year subscription to
Penthouse for Thorne. Hawking eventually made good on his end of the wager and revealed that he had sent Thorne his skin-mag subscription "much to the outrage of Kip's liberated wife."
i like him.
ReplyDelete